InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 1853
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/19/2002

Re: DGagnon819 post# 5486

Friday, 05/30/2003 1:41:32 PM

Friday, May 30, 2003 1:41:32 PM

Post# of 97785
EP,
I stand corrected. I was referrring to this...http://www.intergraph.com/intel/order.htm
However, I hope you can understand what that my basic point was that there are reasons for the suspicion. Good luck,
D



I believe he understands, and just forgot to point out that the injunction you reference was preliminary, and was subsequently reversed on appeal. Not surprised the reversal wasn't mentioned at that site, since the reference given was from Intergraph.

http://www.techlawjournal.com/atr/19991108.htm
Appeals Court Vacates Injunction in Intergraph v. Intel
(November 8, 1999) On Friday, as one federal judge concluded that Microsoft is a monopoly, another federal judge's conclusion that Intel would be found to be an illegal monopoly was reversed. The Court of Appeals vacated the U.S. District Court Judge Edwin Nelson's preliminary injunction in Intergraph v. Intel.

Semi
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMD News