InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 274
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/27/2013

Re: flyersdh post# 2612

Tuesday, 08/26/2014 1:24:07 PM

Tuesday, August 26, 2014 1:24:07 PM

Post# of 14646
Sorry. My intent was to credit you for the link to the document, but not the reference regarding a nine-figure damages award. The award reference was from the document. I thought that excerpt shows how valuable the patent may be:

"The discovery RPI seeks is uncontroversial. RPI requested from Apple the information it used to obtain a preliminary injunction and nine-figure damages award against Samsung. Both awards were based largely on the evidence Apple submitted about Siri’s value. Despite RPI’s repeated and specific requests, Apple has refused to produce that information, and other information like it. Such information is highly probative of the reasonable royalty Apple would have paid to RPI in a hypothetical negotiation that would have occurred
just months before Apple sued Samsung for infringing Apple patents covering Siri. Apple’s discovery misconduct is improper and the Court should compel Apple to produce the discovery RPI seeks."
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent MARA News