InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 541
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/24/2014

Re: alanthill post# 22047

Sunday, 08/24/2014 2:59:06 AM

Sunday, August 24, 2014 2:59:06 AM

Post# of 81999
Do you care to back up your wild claims and assumptions:

...some (what I consider to be ) bonehead moves like the outright purchase of a 3/4 million dollar printer (that has yet to be delivered). It is extremely hard for me to understand why time could not be leased on a close by printer, or at worst enter into a lease instead of a purchase agreement on the printer they acquired. The excuse that it was going to be a revenue generator for custom made parts was simply laughable.



I wonder if there are companies that would have use for critical parts printed on a state of the art EOS DLMS printer with multi sensor quality assurance data to back it up?

I wonder if it is in Sigma's best interest to be able to demonstrate their IPQA system to other clients besides GE Aviation and Honeywell?

I wonder if Sigma's recent hires, who perhaps are not the ones working in house at both GE and Honeywell, would benefit from having the latest EOS printer with PR3D installed for testing and refining their PR3D modules?

Spoiler alert, I don't really wonder about these things.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent SASI News