InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 704
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/09/2014

Re: copperslash post# 54564

Monday, 08/18/2014 12:36:13 PM

Monday, August 18, 2014 12:36:13 PM

Post# of 68424
I do not think Google would have lost on obviousness with Lang's patent if it was the other way around.
The perception would be that the great innovator Google has something that is so special that it must be protected.
If the two judges can look at it that way and still come to the same conclusion, then this was just. I do not think they would have. I think the other way around it would have be a 3-0 ruling for Google.