InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3
Posts 82
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/09/2012

Re: None

Monday, 08/18/2014 12:03:36 AM

Monday, August 18, 2014 12:03:36 AM

Post# of 68424
IMO there's more here than meets the eye. I can't believe the Patent office doesn't know what obvious means. Also wasn't the obvious issue litigated before Judge Jackson? The CAFC does have the last word but its second guessing here seems capricious and it seems like very poor public policy in that patents cannot be relied on .