Followers | 377 |
Posts | 17235 |
Boards Moderated | 3 |
Alias Born | 03/07/2014 |
Thursday, August 14, 2014 6:06:26 PM
"Judges Side with FDA on Stem Cells
A US federal appeals court maintains that stem cells proliferated in a lab must be regulated as a drug.
http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/39108/title/Judges-Side-with-FDA-on-Stem-Cells/
And THAT is EXACTLY what BHRT is doing. Removing the cells from the body and "manipulating/modifying" them in a "lab" environment, and then re-inserting them into the body.
Case closed, IMO. That court case and the FDA prevailed. The wording is clear. The defendant was trying to argue the very "biologics" exemption that keeps getting repeated, and they lost, and lost again on appeal. Simple as that IMO.
ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) Launchs IQ Nano Drone for Commercial Indoor Use • HALO • Oct 10, 2024 8:09 AM
CBD Life Sciences Inc. (CBDL) Targets Alibaba as the Next Retail Giant for Wholesale Expansion of Top-Selling CBD Products • CBDL • Oct 10, 2024 8:00 AM
Foremost Lithium Announces Option Agreement with Denison on 10 Uranium Projects Spanning over 330,000 Acres in the Athabasca Basin, Saskatchewan • FAT • Oct 10, 2024 5:51 AM
Element79 Gold Corp. Reports Significant Progress in Community Relations and Development Efforts in Chachas, Peru • ELEM • Oct 9, 2024 10:30 AM
Unitronix Corp Launches Share Buyback Initiative • UTRX • Oct 9, 2024 9:10 AM
BASANITE INDUSTRIES, LLC RECEIVES U.S. PATENT FOR ITS BASAFLEX™ BASALT FIBER COMPOSITE REBAR AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING • BASA • Oct 9, 2024 7:30 AM