Dave,
Black and white hey? Let me explain it yet again. And yes I noticed he was just removed as a moderator as well as that post.
The point is about overt bias.
1. You simply focus in on one little detail of that post (the ban comment) and then dismiss my point - clearly an attempt to avoid a real debate on my point and admit that my point on bias was correct. You choose to ignore all of his other commentary and simply focus on one minute part of it that is incorrect.
This is called deflection, those of us who have legal degrees are well versed in identifying this tactic as it's used frequently.
2. You ignore the fact regardless of the 'ban' issue, that the post I mentioned clearly shows an 'aggressive bias' where someone is 'looking for a reason' and wants to exert their power.
3. My point was simply, how people's posts are deleted is a farse, it leads to angry rebuttals - as often there is very little to support the removal of the post other than the aggressive/power seeking bias clearly exemplified in the post mentioned.
As a result, people end up getting frustrated and do say things that are not appropriate.
I suggest you review what I have said, review the post/quote and think about it for a while
You seem to want to 'be right' vs. actually accepting some constructive criticism for this site, which would actually improve it, that being, removing biased moderators.
Thanks Dave
