Nutroganics Inc. (NUTTQ)

[thesmalls]

they provided the proof in the 1Q14 NUTT filing to OTC about the share count. they did not own shares in 2004 when the last report was filed with the SEC (or at least they were not registered as 5% owners at the time).

in the absence of transparency or refusal to act as a fiduciary for ALL shareholders, it is rather trite and disingenuous for you to suggest i have no proof when they have the legal and ethical responsibility to provide the transparency that would prove they DID do everything by the book.

i can only go by what has been filed/disclosed or what i have found that is public record. i know they have settled numerous IP suits and none of those settlement terms were disclosed. i know they were using previous settlements/cases as foundations for current cases and requesting same venues to fast track the cases based on prior foundations. one doesnt keep suing and requesting same venue if they are losing. while the parties of the suits may have been confidential - the impact of the terms (ie revenues, royalties, licensing fees, etc) coming from those settlements are CERTAINLY material and those two CERTAINLY had a responsibility to disclose the impact on the company/shareholders. if they are using the argument that the settlements were inconsequential to results - why continue to use company funds to go after more non producing/productive settlements? they cant have it both ways.

so - go ask your buddies to provide that transparency to current MLOG shareholders and provide transparent disclosure for the current NUTT entity and then you can objectively argue my claims are without merit or unsubstantiated.