InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 112680
Next 10
Followers 60
Posts 5252
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 11/10/2009

Re: None

Wednesday, 08/13/2014 1:43:10 PM

Wednesday, August 13, 2014 1:43:10 PM

Post# of 112680
the TECHNICAL take on the PPS says MCIG was not feverishly "over capitalized" in the micro-cap frenzy of early 2014, it was accumulated with that sector momentum, but the PPS high was properly recalibrated to the current range of .42-.54……….where we presently sit

other vape or ecig have their business model to substantiate their PPS, in comparison to MCIG, most have a 5-8 month history that is lacking, and TIMING( or should I say that MCIG's timing was better than those MCIG gets compared to )

MCIG also has VCIG in its PPS, which we will get price leveling occurring when that stock starts trading

MCIG is valued at "near high" or appropriate levels currently, and NEEDS to maintain or boost its revenues to keep its valuation…..they also need to simplify the share confusion about the available treasury shares that the CEO controls ( outside of his restricted or "promised locked-up" shares)

dilution can occur at ANY time a CEO deems proper to support the company, the CEO here has said that in his "lock-up" commentary

the market has accepted the "record revenue" as necessary to HOLD the PPS, MCIG investors need to realize this RISK and expect no rise until fundamental changes are implemented
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent BTZI News