InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 377
Posts 17235
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 03/07/2014

Re: None

Monday, 08/11/2014 12:27:36 PM

Monday, August 11, 2014 12:27:36 PM

Post# of 106844
One hour (actually about 1.5 hours now into trading day) and only two trades. First was for about $550 bucks, second was maybe another $600 or so.

It's traded about $1,100 bucks 1.5 hours )heading on 2 hours now) into trading day. Vol is gone, way, way off.

I'd expect a potential big sell-off day again IMO if the MM gets it to crack that 3 cent area, that's the pattern for the last 3 months. Even a "modest" sell order at this point, on these anemic volumes, will sink the price in a blink IMO, as it has in the recent past. There's still a lot of low priced shares hanging out there and more convertible debt deals in just this latest 10-Q, which means a big seller is lurking out there somewhere IMO.

And it's not in a "overall bullish uptrend" IMO. The 3 month chart is flat and all over the map, with the high vol days being huge sell-off dump days.

It sold off hard (like 5 million plus vol day) as recently as July 21st taking it to the 200 DMA and has been sitting on the 50 DMA for most of the time since then (at about .025 and has only moved up on low vol and huge spreads by the MM).

It sold off hard on May 19th and July 21 and hit or broke the 200 DMA. And it sat on the 200 DMA for a period from June 8th to about June 16th. It sat on the 50 DMA, .026 approx. from late July to just the past week.

Those high vol sell/dump days are about one month apart and occurred each time they got it to crack about 3 cents. That means it's probably due again right about now IMO. Of course the past chart can not predict the future, but this pattern has been pretty solid for 3 months now.

I don't know what a "blog" would do for anything? The 10-Q was just released, so what difference would a "blog" make? If it's not said in the 10-Q, then it really doesn't matter anyway IMO. Further, the blog was being hosted/run on a site that is not in anyway connected to the Bioheart official web site. It was being hosted and run on GruXXrs site, a domain connected to the StemcellXXX site. The blog site is down and has been down for months- like it's potentially been abandoned. I'd have to check the URL registration and see if it's even claimed or valid anymore.

http://www.isitdownrightnow.com/stemcellceo.com.html

stemcellceo.com is down and down hard, and has been for months. So unless someone else is going to host/handle that "blog" it's not going to be at the old location IMO, at least not now. But again, what difference does a "blog" make when your PR barrage(s) and then your 10-Q hasn't really moved the needle and certainly hasn't helped the volume recently? If those don't do it, then why would a "blog" be a big deal? I don't get it?

And what difference does "Angel" make- it's a 5-person phase I being done in Mexico, like going back to square-one all over again? FIVE patients total. They have major phase II/III trials that have gone nowhere for heading on 5 yrs now. They have the infamous IMO, "MIRROR" trial, a supposed phase III that "vanished" and was not even mentioned in the Q-1, 10-Q (the word literally did not appear in the filing via a search) and the word "MIRROR" was now mentioned 2 times in this latest, Q-2, 10-Q filing. Other than that, MIRROR was apparently only a "PR event" for the most part IMO, with "one patient enrolled" and that was over one year ago now.

From this latest 10-Q, the only wording where "MIRROR" appeared, Page 27:
"We are seeking to secure sufficient funds to reinitiate enrollment in the MARVEL and REGEN trials. If we successfully secure such funds, we intend to re-engage a contract research organization, or CRO, investigators and certain suppliers to advance such trials. We have initiated and enrolled our first patient in the MIRROR trial in 2013. The trial is very similar to the MARVEL trial but focusses on sites outside the US. We will continue enrollment in the MIRROR trial once we have secured sufficient funds."

So from that wording, it appears that even MIRROR is now dead in the water, for "lack of funding", same old, same old IMO. It vanished, but now says it will "continue enrollment" once "we have secured sufficient funds."

So all that big PR over a year ago about MIRROR and how it was a "phase III" and all, then it never really did a thing except get "one patient enrolled". So, what difference would a 5-patient, phase I, ANGEL make, when MIRROR can't even move forward, same as REGEN and MARVEL can't move forward? Seeing a pattern here? I sure do.

So, lets say "ANGEL" gets "updated"? Then what? It would need to become a phase II one would suppose? But they can't even move forward the phase II or III trial(s), plural, or the big, PR hyped MIRROR, they have from the distant and recent past. So what's the point even of another phase I? What's that supposed to even gain them, other than more PR? I don't see where it would go? What's the point of it? If you can't/couldn't move ahead your two most important trials to date, and you then boast of a "phase III" called MIRROR, and no "big funder" has stepped up in 5 yrs to move any of them forward, and almost all your staff and Sr. mgt and many of your former BOD all departed the company in that time period and you delisted from NASDAQ and sank from $5 bucks to then about .50 cents and now to less than 3 cents with a low of 6/10ths of one cent, in that time period- and you diluted the stock by 100' and 100's of millions of shares- but still couldn't move even one of those, now qty-3 trials forward, then what's another phase I "update" supposed to do for you now?

Still don't get it? What difference does "ANGEL" make to anything?