Sylios Corp. (fka UNGS)

[linkvest]

Comparison from Stervc UNGS vs ERBB

stervc Member Level Monday, 06/23/14 09:29:53 AM
Re: None
Post # of 40538

Please, I have to humbly ask that anyone reading this post, please understand that this is in no way a knock about ERBB (American Green) and anything going on with their operations. This post is not made to ”devalue” the operations of ERBB. This post that I am making is to show how we could possibly ”value the new operations of UNGS and show how UNGS could very possibly be significantly undervalued based on creating a ”Compare & Contrast” post between UNGS and a company that is utilizing the same operational concept with their kiosk machines that UNGS will be utilizing within the Marijuana Industry to help to be able to gage where UNGS could very likely trade upon completion of the Signifi Solutions, Inc. acquisition.

Please understand that the share price of both UNGS and ERBB will fluctuate on a regular basis. Because of this, please use the substitution Property to substitute out any variable that might change later in the future with either of the companies. I will create the baseline of this post from the last trading day of this past Friday, 20 Jun 2014 to create a Market Cap Analysis:

** ERBB Share Price = .0243
** UNGS Share Price = .0026

** ERBB Outstanding Shares (OS) = 3,851,572,678
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/ERBB/profile
** UNGS Outstanding Shares (OS) = 576,332,181
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/UNGS/profile

** ERBB Market Cap = $93,593,216
** UNGS Market Cap = $1,498,464

Just by considering the above Market Cap Analysis between both ERBB and UNGS… UNGS is approximately 62 times cheaper or smaller than where ERBB exists. This means that it could be justified for UNGS to be trading 62 times higher than its current price of .0026 per share. That would approximately equate to… .16+ per share as the value for where UNGS could fundamentally exist to trade; conservatively speaking. From what I’m hearing, the company is not going to do a reverse split. This means that the OS could double or so as an option as there are enough shares in the company's treasury of shares in its Authorized Shares (AS) kitty to secure/close the deal. Or… maybe the OS could remain the same if Preferred Shares are used to capture the controlling interest to consummate the deal instead of common shares. Again, this is why I have to stress to use the Substitution Property to substitute any variable above that might change at any particular time.