InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 53
Posts 1044
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/22/2014

Re: None

Friday, 08/08/2014 12:51:32 PM

Friday, August 08, 2014 12:51:32 PM

Post# of 341664
About the patent rights negotiated for...

http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=6,711,465.PN.&OS=PN/6,711,465&RS=PN/6,711,465

This very first sentence of the patent says it all…”Vending machine having a biometric verification system for authorizing the sales of regulated products.” THIS MEANS ABSOLUTE, COMPLETE PROPRIETARY RIGHTS FOR ALL SALES OF REGULATED PRODUCTS. I read this to mean that if anyone that tries to sell regulated products such as Marijuana, or other types of governmentally regulated products, or methods of dispersion, will infringement of the patent rights that ERBB just purchased from the holder of the patent. Anyone that wants to sell regulated products, such as MJ edibles, medicinals, etc., will have to seek specific licensing agreements with AG.

Also, it is important to note that these patents are international, and AG controls all rights in the world for dispersion of any kind of regulated products such as MJ. This could open up the door for major investment capital for AG.
This is a game changer, as something as powerful as proprietary patent rights increases the worth, and respectability of AG.

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to vending machines that sell products directly to the public. More particularly, the present invention relates to vending machines having identification verification capabilities to ensure that the person buying a product from the vending machine is legally allowed to make the purchase. NOTE: This might be why Shearin has been dragging his feet with the roll out of the machines, which might have been a major disaster had he gone ahead and infringed upon Tomassi’s patents. He had the cart ahead of the horse for a while, but now appears to have it legally right.

READ THE CLAIMS, AS THIS SPELLS OUT EXACTLY WHAT THE INVENTION SPELLS OUT.

AG patents that were acquired in the agreement and a few preliminary searches…

http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=7,493,190.PN.&OS=PN/7,493,190&RS=PN/7,493,190

http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-adv.htm&r=0&f=S&l=50&d=PTXT&RS=%28%28%28%28vending+AND+machine%29+AND+biometric%29+AND+regulated%29+AND+products%29&Refine=Refine+Search&Refine=Refine+Search&Query=vending+and+machines+and+maryjuana (NO patents containing these 3 words)

http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-adv.htm&r=0&f=S&l=50&d=PTXT&RS=%28%28%28%28vending+AND+machine%29+AND+biometric%29+AND+regulated%29+AND+products%29&Refine=Refine+Search&Refine=Refine+Search&Query=vending+and+machines+and+biometric+and+maryjuana (NO patents)

I found NO combinations of words, so, from a preliminary search, the patent rights are strong…and can be made stronger with the incorporation of marijuana and related types of products into a new patent application, or an addendum addition to the present ones…which I would recommend for the management to consider.

http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-adv.htm&r=0&f=S&l=50&d=PTXT&Query=vending+and+machines+and+medical+and+maryjuana (NO patents)


Mr. Tomassi’s patents, numbered 6,711,465 and 7,493,190

“In ALL your getting, get understanding.” $1.11