InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 28
Posts 1076
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/20/2006

Re: A deleted message

Thursday, 08/07/2014 10:18:25 PM

Thursday, August 07, 2014 10:18:25 PM

Post# of 665
First of all - know the difference between libel and slander. Second - truth is the ultimate defense in either case. Third - I have presented facts about the scenrios that abound. If the conclusions are inaccurate - it is because the two were not transparent and violated that fiduciary responsibility. Do you know what fiduciary is/means? Do you know what a material event is? Do you understand the roles and responsibilities of being a fiduciary and that your actions have to be ABOVE reproach so as to not provide the appearance of impropriety. ..?

IF the two had executed their fiduciary responsibilities in the manner in which the positons were accepted as representatives of shareholders - there would be no need for accusations or guessing on where the mkney did or did not go. Further - they refuse to provide the proof that can prove their innocence and/or benevolence. Why would they NOT show where the money came and went...? What good does that do the shareholders by withholding it.?

You can throw big words around and make subtle suggestions that some might buy - but in the end - they failed as fiduciaries regardless. Whether or not they broke the law or SEC regulations (other than the things already highlighted) remains to be seen.