Wednesday, August 06, 2014 9:15:17 PM
So typing this on a mobile so it was easier to just copy your response and address each part this way.
Have you verified any of this info at other sources then a company PR? Name dropping and partnership with unverifiable small companies is one of the most common smoke & mirrors tricks seen in an OTC PR book.
--MINE had an investor conference call in April where Darin Ezra the CEO of PowerBrands spoke and did some Q&A and also had Dan Ginsberg ex CEO of RedBull as part of that call.
Event if any PR is correct, Honest companies get in bed with the devil every day! When it's the only way to raise cash for possible growth. But 1 in a 1000 startups ever reach up listing and/or success. I never found that 1 though.
--Agreed and think the odds are worse then what you stated actually. As I stated before, at least for me the partnerships speak volumes. PowerBrands publicly stated in that call they wanted to work with a publicly traded company for quite a while now and I think PowerBrands gives them an incredible edge over the competition in this field.
--Not only has PowerBrands partnered with Creative Artist Agency (CAA) for our endorsements but we also have Spellcom handling our PR's. Not many OTC companies can say that or even pay half of the toxic debt we've paid without diluting like MINE has.
--To me there doing things correctly because when they decided to change their business model they didn't try and do it themselves. They partnered with industry leaders when it comes to successfully bringing new beverages to the market.
Name dropping and partnerships gives the appearance of legitimacy and can rarely be verified personally. Many partnerships are off shore, on the OTC, just so they can't be checked.
--You could claim those on the CC weren't who they said they were but then that would lend itself to SEC issues as well as lawsuits I'd think.
EX: remember a Lighting company PRing it was installing their system at Wal-Mart's stores under their energy up grade for all US stores. Found out from Wal-Matr contracts department. They actually bid on (1) home town single store and the managers said they didn't win. But Wal- mart got the stock a 5X bounce.
--I've seen companies do the same. EFIR comes to mind with their drilling. Don't see that here.
Yes they have the $2 mil credit line. Verified it. Probably because V. Scott Vanis cosigned. And he controls it's use, which may never be drawn upon. The company as NO assets to back a credit line of $2 mil LOL.
Their 2013 products are smoke, verified that. Not 1 bottle sold. Can't buy them if you want to. Also verified price run was OTC game selling cheap share to emotional herd. Some of my research gives me the feeling maybe they are trying to create a viable company now. Credit line and V. Scott Vanis seem legit. But both; false past storyline and manipulated run, say forget it. It's just an OTC game stock, selling shares for personal profit. We'll see.
--I don't have any info in front of me regarding time frames but off top of my head delays in 2013 were communicated swiftly and explained up front. Transparent company thus far. I'll take your word on it but was thinking we did have products out in test markets prior to 2013 however even if wrong we did this year in stores and Amazon and will be back in Amazon this month. With 2 million credit I'd imagine we'd see a lot of product rolling out this year. The Q coming out will be flat but 4th quarter Q I expect will tell the tale.
But none of this matters. What matters is the game profits which may become available. By doing what the big guys do! That's buying breakout, selling exhaustion. Not whether the company will succeed. That's for investors and OTC investors end up with bags of worthless share 99.9% of the time !!!
--as an investor in the OTC I've turned 20Grand into half a million. It's kinda like America airlines (if I recall correct company) when they were on brink of closing they turned things around and I think the talent MINE has partnered with and their experience have the potential to go even higher. As for me I got into MINE in the trips based on their announced partnership with PowerBrands and I can tell you I don't regret "Investing" here.
Quote:
Just don't feel like this is just a typical stock of the month or a company that will never amount to anything
Over the past 10 years I've heard "NOT typical" so many times and thought that myself, in my early days. 10 years and Only 1 company ever amounted to anything. And that lasted several months on the big board. Before being delisted and management being put in jail. So NO I don't feel any OTC stock is worth holding as an investment.
Fair enough. Thanks for the response and your time.
IMO
Have you verified any of this info at other sources then a company PR? Name dropping and partnership with unverifiable small companies is one of the most common smoke & mirrors tricks seen in an OTC PR book.
--MINE had an investor conference call in April where Darin Ezra the CEO of PowerBrands spoke and did some Q&A and also had Dan Ginsberg ex CEO of RedBull as part of that call.
Event if any PR is correct, Honest companies get in bed with the devil every day! When it's the only way to raise cash for possible growth. But 1 in a 1000 startups ever reach up listing and/or success. I never found that 1 though.
--Agreed and think the odds are worse then what you stated actually. As I stated before, at least for me the partnerships speak volumes. PowerBrands publicly stated in that call they wanted to work with a publicly traded company for quite a while now and I think PowerBrands gives them an incredible edge over the competition in this field.
--Not only has PowerBrands partnered with Creative Artist Agency (CAA) for our endorsements but we also have Spellcom handling our PR's. Not many OTC companies can say that or even pay half of the toxic debt we've paid without diluting like MINE has.
--To me there doing things correctly because when they decided to change their business model they didn't try and do it themselves. They partnered with industry leaders when it comes to successfully bringing new beverages to the market.
Name dropping and partnerships gives the appearance of legitimacy and can rarely be verified personally. Many partnerships are off shore, on the OTC, just so they can't be checked.
--You could claim those on the CC weren't who they said they were but then that would lend itself to SEC issues as well as lawsuits I'd think.
EX: remember a Lighting company PRing it was installing their system at Wal-Mart's stores under their energy up grade for all US stores. Found out from Wal-Matr contracts department. They actually bid on (1) home town single store and the managers said they didn't win. But Wal- mart got the stock a 5X bounce.
--I've seen companies do the same. EFIR comes to mind with their drilling. Don't see that here.
Yes they have the $2 mil credit line. Verified it. Probably because V. Scott Vanis cosigned. And he controls it's use, which may never be drawn upon. The company as NO assets to back a credit line of $2 mil LOL.
Their 2013 products are smoke, verified that. Not 1 bottle sold. Can't buy them if you want to. Also verified price run was OTC game selling cheap share to emotional herd. Some of my research gives me the feeling maybe they are trying to create a viable company now. Credit line and V. Scott Vanis seem legit. But both; false past storyline and manipulated run, say forget it. It's just an OTC game stock, selling shares for personal profit. We'll see.
--I don't have any info in front of me regarding time frames but off top of my head delays in 2013 were communicated swiftly and explained up front. Transparent company thus far. I'll take your word on it but was thinking we did have products out in test markets prior to 2013 however even if wrong we did this year in stores and Amazon and will be back in Amazon this month. With 2 million credit I'd imagine we'd see a lot of product rolling out this year. The Q coming out will be flat but 4th quarter Q I expect will tell the tale.
But none of this matters. What matters is the game profits which may become available. By doing what the big guys do! That's buying breakout, selling exhaustion. Not whether the company will succeed. That's for investors and OTC investors end up with bags of worthless share 99.9% of the time !!!
--as an investor in the OTC I've turned 20Grand into half a million. It's kinda like America airlines (if I recall correct company) when they were on brink of closing they turned things around and I think the talent MINE has partnered with and their experience have the potential to go even higher. As for me I got into MINE in the trips based on their announced partnership with PowerBrands and I can tell you I don't regret "Investing" here.
Quote:
Just don't feel like this is just a typical stock of the month or a company that will never amount to anything
Over the past 10 years I've heard "NOT typical" so many times and thought that myself, in my early days. 10 years and Only 1 company ever amounted to anything. And that lasted several months on the big board. Before being delisted and management being put in jail. So NO I don't feel any OTC stock is worth holding as an investment.
Fair enough. Thanks for the response and your time.
IMO
Join the InvestorsHub Community
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.