InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 171
Posts 18526
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 11/29/2010

Re: A deleted message

Wednesday, 08/06/2014 3:17:27 PM

Wednesday, August 06, 2014 3:17:27 PM

Post# of 163728
I stand by my analysis

Entrepreneur Magazine reports

"The Ethics of Markup"

Even though there is no hard and fast rule for pricing merchandise, most retailers use a 50 percent markup, known in the trade as keystone. What this means, in plain language, is doubling your cost to establish the retail price. Because markup is figured as a percentage of the sales price, doubling the cost means a 50 percent markup. For example, if your cost on an item is $1, your selling price will be $2. Fifty percent of $2 is $1, which is your markup. http://www.entrepreneur.com/article/193986

Kmart retails the most popular Motovox Mini Bike for $380. Based on the above (as I asserted earlier) APT's cut would be $190 --out of which they have to deduct ALL costs of production, transportation and overhead. This is called a "reasonable assumption" --the sort of thing people do every day in the investing world.

But let's say I'm off by 100% and their bottom line profit is actually DOUBLE the $25 per unit I predicted.

4,000 units x $50 profit=$200k
20,0000 units x $50= $1 million for the year

This would mean APT would be able to bring a mini bike to market for a total cost of $140 each in order to realize $50 in net profit.

APT has already proven they can generate plenty of sales and STILL skate right to the edge of bankruptcy. So what, if anything, is different this time?

We're entitled to our own opinions --but not our own facts.