InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 138
Posts 4589
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/08/2011

Re: Mikhail507 post# 162449

Friday, 08/01/2014 9:49:09 PM

Friday, August 01, 2014 9:49:09 PM

Post# of 263764
OK, I get your frustration, but this is a penny start-up. Is it unreasonable to think that GRCU shareholders were satisfied with over 1000% gains and decided to bank? If Calkin did everything right fluffed us to tears with PRs and you and I were satisfied, would it still be reasonable to think shareholders are entitled to cash in? Is it then Calkins fault that we decide when we've, each individually, have had enough, and selling compounded by a cooling sector continued the slide?

Unprofessional? How? Because he hasn't told us anything when there is nothing to say yet? Would you rather have fluff PR after fluff PR and an eventual investigation from the SEC for questionable public reports? Or is that not possible?

Yes, the CEO runs the company. I know from experience doing so. I also know that very little but foundation work gets done in the first several months to a year. Research, planning and then execution. The building from the foundation to the apex. Not the other way around. GRCU in the red before the black. The PPS went to .049 on hype, excitement and a sector on fire my friend. We did that, not the CEO. Thinking otherwise is wrong thinking.

This sector is far from dead Mikhail. It's in it's infancy as is GRCU. Will they misstep? Yes, they will and have. So have I as a leader. It doesn't mark GRCU for death. Nothing has changed about our potential. Does it stink that we have to rinse and repeat? Yup. Do you think that our very intelligent crew here weren't prepared for this? Many were and we'll see it through. Hopefully you'll bank as well. All IMO.