InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 1171
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/02/2011

Re: glenc post# 5098

Saturday, 07/26/2014 10:53:35 PM

Saturday, July 26, 2014 10:53:35 PM

Post# of 20102
glenc...do read up on the litigation. V/MC's argument for 3 1/2 years was that the "464 patent" was not a valid patent. The most recent court upheld the validity of the patent...as did other court decisions. Thus going into this phase of litigation V/MC now has to change their complete defence.

AND I agree with other posters when they say that Bright is a big reason to hold on to hope of a damage award. He and his firm is doing this on a contingency basis...no win...no money for them or us.

As for the card, changes to improve it have been made along the way. To say or intimate that one does not exist is a personal insult to Chaya and a complete statement of ignorance. In June the product was presented at the National Investment Bankers Assoc. One does not go before such a body with the intent to defraud.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent SMME News