when you look at a stock like this and factor in what is stated here it is always good to consider the source and the history of the source
the company has made statements and the history has shown the progress based on such
the input from the company is now very limited and so the only other source of input is from outside sources
if you consider the history of info from outside sources and see that it is consistently negative with nothing to support those statements it is obvious that that input should not be considered as anything more than hot air
once again... actions speak louder than empty words from outside sources that have nothing substantial to contribute and no history to validate claims (liberty given to the fact that they are actually claims bc i see it as nothing more than haters gonna hate since there is no reasonable input, the investors that use that input as dd are new, everyone else sees right through it for what it is)
when a stock is at .0001 and there is negative input that is not backed by anything but a history of negative posts it makes you wonder the reasoning behind the intentions.... i can see some being proud to be an educator, or bashing to get cheap shares but to continually post negative comments with nothing to back it on ACLP based on where it is and what is happening here just does not make sense.
if there is constructive factual negative input that can demonstrate where this is not about to become a winner please help us see the facts that support it,
until then, based on the company pr and the filings i see this as a solid money maker in the making
