Wednesday, July 23, 2014 1:40:02 PM
If for some reason Scott was dropped by Televisionadgroup. Was it because he violated the Terms and Conditions?
Something else to think about
Now what was the reason the public was blowing up the Ad Agency's phone in the 1st place?
The Ads were supposed to roll out June 1st, they didn't and Scott was silent for over 10 days.
After all of the news released so far, filing with the SEC again, 1st and 2nd quarter numbers, Call Center News, TV ads starting....why on earth is this PPS trading well under its 52 week high of .0077
IMO, it appears as though the Market is focusing on the CEO actions and not Anything, Everything, Anyone and Everyone else....
How many times did Scott's name come up when People called about the No Show TV ads? How did this make one of Televisionadgroups clients look?
If Scott would've responded in a timely most of the Televisionadgroups calls could have been avoided IMO.
IMO People called Televsionadgroup because they couldn't get answers from Scott.
Look at all the Real Question Facebook posts Scott deleted about the TV ads
At what point does the CEO get held responsible?
IMO SEEK Distractions aren't working.....just check the current PPS :(
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM