InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 27
Posts 2968
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/14/2014

Re: specutator post# 81950

Saturday, 07/12/2014 5:00:13 PM

Saturday, July 12, 2014 5:00:13 PM

Post# of 123645
What common sense would that be? There are worse pinks and this is a less offensive turd? Can you back up any of your claims as to legitimate value with hard data? I think we'd all be interested in seeing your valuation method. Tastes good and I talked to someone on Facebook isn't cutting it. How can a company that's burned through $30 million plus with only four or five employees, tanked once already, has no cash and has 510 million shares out there of which 340 million were issued in the last year or so for a 66% dilution, be a company of any value? They have no sales to speak of. They have no inventory to sell other than the $200,000 worth at gross margin which is worth $.0001 share price book. Do you think there's something, anything that warrants a 200X multiplier on a commodity consumer product? This isn't an internet company. They have costs. It's not virtual product.

Fair valuation is based on numbers and facts. So it's really simple everyone. $200,000 less costs, less operating is $60,000 every 6 month (and I think that's being generous). $120,000 in revenue over OS is book at $.0002 per share. As an importer, not a manufacturer a fair multiplier would be 10X making their fair value roughly $.002. Now this doesn't even take into account they owe $2 million plus in payables or that they have a 5 year old payroll tax issue of a quarter million accumulating penalties and interest. I see no basis for your valuation claims but I welcome you to present them. Just give us some objective data with backup versus personal opinion. You must remember that people may read what is said here and believe it for fact or supportable information. If it is not, it is misinformation.