NanoViricides Inc. (NNVC)

[JG36]

The FDA no doubt saw the same claims we saw in the press releases, and not much more. After all, the pre-IND meeting was not about convincing the FDA of the efficacy of Flucide, it was about getting specifics from the FDA of what they would require to grant NNVC an IND for Flucide. particularly about what sort of toxicity tests would be required. Before approving phase I tests the FDA will want to see the evidence for efficacy in curing rodents of the flu. But we're not at the point yet where the FDA cares.

Why do you even think the SEC would try to evaluate the scientific claims for Flucide? That's not part of their job description. Likewise for the NYSE National Market Exchange.

BASi is a company that gets paid to do tox tests for pharmaceutical companies. They take no position on the efficacy of the drugs they test. Do you really think BASi said, "We won't take your money and do the tox tests unless you can prove to us that this stuff cures the flu in mice."?

I would be very interested in hearing Dr. Harris' own opinion of the efficacy of Denguecide. But I won't hear that until she is no longer under the nondisclosure requirements. All we get now are Dr. Seymour's claims about her opinions.

I doubt that anybody working for Public Health England would state that they have seen scientific proof of NNVC's claims. Instead, they no doubt see the claims as intriguing, possibly true, and anyhow it won't hurt to give NNVC a crack at finding a cure for some new disease.

We have Dr. Seymour claiming to cures for various viral disease. We have some respectable, knowledgeable people who believe there might be some truth to those claims. What we don't have is the actual published experimental evidence that would allow me or any other investor to decide for himself how good the claims are.