InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 55
Posts 1406
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/28/2013

Re: RB_79 post# 134958

Thursday, 07/10/2014 9:25:31 AM

Thursday, July 10, 2014 9:25:31 AM

Post# of 162921
GDSM Well you were correct on the name displayed and I was wrong and admit that. But with only approx. 17 displayerss at the conference regardless of name displayed I am sure evaluation of the products offered was more the consideration rather than a name. In fact the name wouldn't even have to have anything to do with the pot sector. It could be called Joe Shoe co. What matter is what you are displaying and that is all.

You are probably correct that the pps now is reflecting the true value of the co. If in fact some news indicating a deal was made separate from the 420 Concept or Merchant and it does really create the potential for a profit from that, then it might change the pps. I don't expect an financial numbers from 420, Xchange or Merchant to be published until financials. So it would be up to each person to determine if that is or might be good.

GDSM does have a lot of debt with the judgment. It will create more of a challenge than most but still does not mean the complete potential is dead or never can go anywhere. You have to start somewhere but if nothing is seen attempted nothing at all could ever change.

GLTU

Go GDSM!!!!!!!!!!!
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent GRLF News