InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 1124
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/07/2005

Re: pennyjunkie post# 10291

Wednesday, 03/29/2006 12:29:07 PM

Wednesday, March 29, 2006 12:29:07 PM

Post# of 311057
pennyjunkie, please see responses below...

1. Company released intent to move to OTCBB as soon as possible, but SEC restrictions will slow that process down. It is on management's to-do list so it will just take time.

2. Sulja Bros website with posted financials (all be it unaudited) reduced the unknown quite a bit. Will need to wait for merger completion and audited financials for the rest of the story.

3. Facts seem to point to this, but no real way to prove it i guess. I think this will become obvious in the future if/when shorts begin to cover.

4. Spam FAX? Who cares? Even if it was the company, it only makes sense to let people know that you have shorty caught with his pants down in any way, shape and form possible.

5. Proof of merger? There is enough legal evidence to warrant a big lawsuit if all of this merger talk is untrue. I tend to side on the trusting side when stuff like this is in writing on various websites.

6. MM depressing price to avoid covering? I don't understand this logic. Seems like they would depress the price to allow for covering. As each month goes by it just allows for longs to buy more at these levels which puts more strain on the shorts. If the company does in fact have or get complete control of the float then that can only spell disaster for the shorts. Once that is complete a simple call to a venture capital firm or small cap institution should ignite the powder keg.


I see your points but I just don't beleive that they warrant this depressed of a price. Many said the same type of stuff about IDWD and it eventually took off. Time will tell on this one as well.