InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 402
Posts 48894
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/20/2011

Re: turn144 post# 198711

Thursday, 07/03/2014 2:22:47 PM

Thursday, July 03, 2014 2:22:47 PM

Post# of 232509
There is actually a reasonable basis to suggest this.

1) a second twitter account was created when this social media strategy started. What was wrong with the original one? It was followed. Why create a new one? Also why hasn't the old one been taken down?

2) the Facebook page was created on April 1, 2014 at the same time the NEW Twitter feed was created.

3) the first announcement of the coming Form 10 was riddled with significant errors in both references to the Form types and the process. Frankly way more than someone with even a passing understanding of SEC filings would make. And lets not forget that JR's other ticker is (or was....) regularly making SEC filings...so he knows this stuff. Even the first correction (which came out minutes after a number of us where pointing out these errors on the board) STILL had errors...not typos. Whoever was writing that tweet/Facebook post and the follow-up did not understand the Form 10 process but was certainly paying attention to iHub.

4) all of the tweets and facebook posts have been remarkably vague.

5) and we know have a Facebook post that reads like a posting on this board. I honestly don't think JR would do that...it serves no purpose. But I could see someone else doing so...in part out of frustration of the discussion here.

6) and finally, NOTHING that has been suggested as coming (Form 10, audited fins, etc.) have actually shown up.

Individually, none of the above may mean much, taken together I think they do.