InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 72
Posts 101159
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 08/01/2006

Re: rooster post# 224605

Tuesday, 07/01/2014 10:08:33 PM

Tuesday, July 01, 2014 10:08:33 PM

Post# of 483249
A months pay for your circumcision? .. an IUD for women on the minimum wage,
nearly a months pay .. how would you feel? .. and how expensive are your condoms?

"While you women whine abouT having to pay a couple of bucks for birth control" .. DUH DUH ..

The 8 Best Lines From Ginsburg's Dissent on the Hobby Lobby Contraception Decision

—By Dana Liebelson
| Mon Jun. 30, 2014 11:32 AM EDT


Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Charlie Neuman/ZUMA

On Monday, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg penned a blistering dissent to the Supreme Court's 5-4 ruling that the government can't require certain employers to provide insurance coverage for methods of birth control and emergency contraception that conflict with their religious beliefs. Ginsburg wrote that her five male colleagues, "in a decision of startling breadth," would allow corporations to opt out of almost any law that they find "incompatible with their sincerely held religious beliefs."

Here are seven more key quotes from Ginsburg's dissent in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby:

* "The exemption sought by Hobby Lobby and Conestoga would…deny legions of women who do not hold their employers' beliefs access to contraceptive coverage"

* "Religious organizations exist to foster the interests of persons subscribing to the same religious faith. Not so of for-profit corporations. Workers who sustain the operations of those corporations commonly are not drawn from one religious community."

* "Any decision to use contraceptives made by a woman covered under Hobby Lobby's or Conestoga's plan will not be propelled by the Government, it will be the woman's autonomous choice, informed by the physician she consults."

* "It bears note in this regard that the cost of an IUD is nearly equivalent to a month's full-time pay for workers earning the minimum wage."

* "Would the exemption…extend to employers with religiously grounded objections to blood transfusions (Jehovah's Witnesses); antidepressants (Scientologists); medications derived from pigs, including anesthesia, intravenous fluids, and pills coated with gelatin (certain Muslims, Jews, and Hindus); and vaccinations[?]…Not much help there for the lower courts bound by today's decision."

* "Approving some religious claims while deeming others unworthy of accommodation could be 'perceived as favoring one religion over another,' the very 'risk the [Constitution's] Establishment Clause was designed to preclude."

* "The court, I fear, has ventured into a minefield."

You can read the full dissent here .. http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2014/06/supreme-court-hobby-lobby-ruling-document. (It starts on page 60.)

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/06/best-lines-hobby-lobby-decision

the article is linked in this one

Why the Supreme Court's Hobby Lobby Decision Is the New Bush v. Gore
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=103878912

It was Plato who said, “He, O men, is the wisest, who like Socrates, knows that his wisdom is in truth worth nothing”

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.