PPJ Healthcare Enterprises Inc (PPJE)

[Ed the Trader]

I wonder what this could possibly mean ? lol

06/25/2014 Declaration (in support of ex parte application )
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner

06/25/2014 Ex-Parte Application
Filed by Attorney for Plaintiff/Petitioner ---hfds1

It means Basu has asked to talk to the judge by herself, without the opposition present. I believe she's done that before. And has been denied. Generally speaking, judges don't like ex parte stuff. ---Janice

It is unlikely that Basu herself did anything. That is why she has Michael Hemming, her lawyer. The lawyer filed something with the court without asking for Grewal's lawyer to be present for the review of the request. There if nothing unusual there; that sort of thing happens every day in courthouses all over the country, and both Basu's attorney and Grewal's attorney have filed several ex parte motions in the past. It is part of the normal operation of a court.

Then, as I noted yesterday when this issue was raised on this forum at that time, Judge White reviewed the request the denied it:

06/25/2014 at 08:30 am in Department 48, Elizabeth Allen White, Presiding
Ex Parte Motion - Denied

Again, there is nothing unusual about this; it does not suggest that either side is winning or losing the civil case. The only reason that this was particularly relevant to PPJ shareholders is that it means that if Hemming was, for any reason, attempting to request for another delay in the trial date, that request was denied, and the trial was still (as of yesterday) scheduled to begin on July 7th.