Wednesday, June 25, 2014 10:03:54 PM
Also, wouldn't Merck or potential partner have the people/resources to scale these trials out and 'synthesize' the data. I doubt merck or others would walk away because oncosec couldn't explain the data. Isn't that the point of getting a partner for a trial? Wouldn't Merck have their own people to do due diligence regardless of what Oncosec explained or presented to them.
Anyways, I appreciate the post; always good to talk and hear peoples theories on things.
Recent ONCSQ News
- Form SC 13G/A - Statement of acquisition of beneficial ownership by individuals: [Amend] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 02/13/2024 07:30:19 PM
FEATURED North Bay Resources Announces Federal (MSHA) Approval of Mt. Vernon Gold Mine Operational Plan and Commencement of Production, Sierra County, California • Oct 21, 2024 9:00 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Announces the Restructuring and Formation of World-Class Research and Development Division to Drive Innovation and New Product Development • HYDI • Oct 21, 2024 9:00 AM
SANUWAVE Announces Reverse Stock Split, Note and Warrant Exchange, and PIPE Offering • SNWV • Oct 18, 2024 9:31 AM
Vocodia Addresses Recent Stock Price Movement and Future Strategic Partnerships • VHAI • Oct 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Mass Megawatts Announces the Start of an Online Discount Solar Energy Equipment Business with Revenue Recognized for the First Time Since Year 2010 in this Fiscal Quarter • MMMW • Oct 18, 2024 7:32 AM
Unitronix Corp Advances DeFi Innovation with Tokenized Real-World Assets Integration • UTRX • Oct 17, 2024 7:38 AM