Monday, June 23, 2014 9:24:43 PM
I always liked Blake:
"Deceiver, dissembler
Your trousers are alight
From what pole or gallows
Shall they dangle in the night?"
It always seems sooooo appropriate to anything and anyone associated with CTTC!
For example, I finally found Ms. Starkweather's results:
http://www.resourcenter.net/images/SNRS/Files/2014/AnnMtg/AbstractProceedings/data/papers/B3-1.html
Why, look! She falls into the Marineo walking on water results category by reporting pain decreases from a mean of 8.4 to around 1.2 at one AND three weeks with calmare versus what she describes as a "non-therapeutic dose" of calmare -- whatever that might be!
Well, you'd think that would get her excited, wouldn't you? But you can't tell it by her pages on the Virginia Commonwealth Nursing School website -- she doesn't mention calmare or the abstract or scrambling neurons ANYWHERE!
And in Conrad's investor presentation, he quotes her as saying:
"A potentially effective non-pharmacological therapy for ameliorating pain intensity in patients with persistent low back pain over short-term."
Well, gee, Angie, you just claimed you practically ELIMINATED your patients pain in your study, but you think it's only "potentially" effective over the "short term?
But the kicker is this chart:
I found that on the website of a new "provider" in Utah (where else, right?) -- and it allegedly represents Angela's unpublished data!
Hmmmmmmmmmm...now, maybe I'm reading it wrong, but that graph and Angela's numbers as given in the abstract don't look like they're even remotely related!
Granted, the new provider looks like he might be related to Conrad:
So maybe he's just illiterate! But I don't think so, given that we're talking about CTTC, a virtual fountainhead of lies, I suspect someone -- or maybe more -- is LYING.
Just speculating, but I suspect perhaps someone working for Angie -- e.g. the therapist -- falsified the results; you know, keep the boss happy. Angie figured it out and, rather than own up, she merely "retreated," letting the calmare fall by her research "wayside," and leaving it with the less than enthusiastic quote that Conrad used. And I suspect the new provider also realized it and "cleaned" up the "data" so it would look more realistic.
I tell'ya, with CTTC it's always one thing or the other!
"Deceiver, dissembler
Your trousers are alight
From what pole or gallows
Shall they dangle in the night?"
It always seems sooooo appropriate to anything and anyone associated with CTTC!
For example, I finally found Ms. Starkweather's results:
http://www.resourcenter.net/images/SNRS/Files/2014/AnnMtg/AbstractProceedings/data/papers/B3-1.html
Why, look! She falls into the Marineo walking on water results category by reporting pain decreases from a mean of 8.4 to around 1.2 at one AND three weeks with calmare versus what she describes as a "non-therapeutic dose" of calmare -- whatever that might be!
Well, you'd think that would get her excited, wouldn't you? But you can't tell it by her pages on the Virginia Commonwealth Nursing School website -- she doesn't mention calmare or the abstract or scrambling neurons ANYWHERE!
And in Conrad's investor presentation, he quotes her as saying:
"A potentially effective non-pharmacological therapy for ameliorating pain intensity in patients with persistent low back pain over short-term."
Well, gee, Angie, you just claimed you practically ELIMINATED your patients pain in your study, but you think it's only "potentially" effective over the "short term?
But the kicker is this chart:
I found that on the website of a new "provider" in Utah (where else, right?) -- and it allegedly represents Angela's unpublished data!
Hmmmmmmmmmm...now, maybe I'm reading it wrong, but that graph and Angela's numbers as given in the abstract don't look like they're even remotely related!
Granted, the new provider looks like he might be related to Conrad:
So maybe he's just illiterate! But I don't think so, given that we're talking about CTTC, a virtual fountainhead of lies, I suspect someone -- or maybe more -- is LYING.
Just speculating, but I suspect perhaps someone working for Angie -- e.g. the therapist -- falsified the results; you know, keep the boss happy. Angie figured it out and, rather than own up, she merely "retreated," letting the calmare fall by her research "wayside," and leaving it with the less than enthusiastic quote that Conrad used. And I suspect the new provider also realized it and "cleaned" up the "data" so it would look more realistic.
I tell'ya, with CTTC it's always one thing or the other!
Join the InvestorsHub Community
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
