InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 657
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 12/25/2005

Re: nlightn post# 12272

Sunday, 06/15/2014 7:53:36 PM

Sunday, June 15, 2014 7:53:36 PM

Post# of 30104
LOL Tyson is a shill. This presentation so disregards the legitimate position against it that one is left astounded that it continues still. Although both have their respective relevance to the situation, obviously short-term weather (1 year/5 year/10 year) does not in and of itself prove anything long-term (many who don't believe in global warming theories have pointed this out all along).

It is the global warming crowd that has the burden of proof and they fail. What we have here is both long-term and short-term analysis do not support Tyson's position. Global warming supporters set themselves up to depend on current short-term trends to support their theories but alas short-term weather speaks against their position and now they claim it is irrelevant just because it doesn't fit their foregone conclusions as they had hoped. Then when this is pointed out, they accuse the other side of their own error the other side pointed out from the start! AGW proponents have the burdon of proof here!

P.S. climate change has and always will happen; somebody just wants to make *you* feel guilty for it and pay them.

****All my posts are my opinion and are not to be taken as advice.****
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=7040

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.