Since it is so easy to define, why is then that three (3) major auditors in the last year haven't been able to figure it out while working for EWSI and two have quit over the issue? Could it be perhaps that there is something very wrong with EWSI accounting methods overseas?
It certainly appears that way, a 10-K, a 10-Q and still not a peep about this "$15 million" that certainly would help increase the value of the company, only that it doesn't exist.
When you look at the honest accounting and truth of the matter, EWSI has no capital invested in China, just a branding/logo agreement. That is why they cannot possibly attribute another companies income as their own, no matter what lipstick they slap on the pig.
Dr H
“The truth is incontrovertible, malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end; there it is.”
