![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Saturday, June 07, 2014 8:59:09 PM
Even though there is an element of irrationality on the part of Google (given the emotional factor), at this point in time, some degree of rationality is still prevalent ( after having been set back by jury and court rulings), as the first appeal is still not ruled on.
I would argue, however, that if the first appeal also turns out to be adverse to Google, and the prospect of the second & third appeal will diminish commensurately, that rational behavior will come to the fore pushing emotions in the background. As such, it will likely dictate another course of action.
The reasoning is as follows: the very real prospect a total or near-total defeat will not only not teach a lesson to future patent litigators, but will actually will do the opposite, i.e. encourage such tendency.
This doesn't even consider other side effects, such as loss of prestige, loss of face as the leader of the anti-troll movement and last but not least adverse stock holder reaction.
An undisclosed, confidential settlement might just do the trick.
Read more: http://vringo.freeforums.net/thread/3881/cost-benefit-google-holding-bitter#ixzz340MmyGIa
FEATURED Cannabix Technologies and Omega Laboratories Inc. Provide Positive Developments on Marijuana Breathalyzer Testing • Jul 11, 2024 8:21 AM
ECGI Holdings Enhances Board with Artificial Intelligence (AI) Expert Ahead of Allon Apparel Launch • ECGI • Jul 10, 2024 8:30 AM
Avant Technologies to Meet Unmet Needs in AI Industry While Addressing Sustainability Concerns • AVAI • Jul 10, 2024 8:00 AM
Panther Minerals Inc. Launches Investor Connect AI Chatbot for Enhanced Investor Engagement and Lead Generation • PURR • Jul 9, 2024 9:00 AM
Glidelogic Corp. Becomes TikTok Shop Partner, Opening a New Chapter in E-commerce Services • GDLG • Jul 5, 2024 7:09 AM
Freedom Holdings Corporate Update; Announces Management Has Signed Letter of Intent • FHLD • Jul 3, 2024 9:00 AM