InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 29
Posts 9421
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/30/2006

Re: None

Friday, 06/06/2014 3:12:33 PM

Friday, June 06, 2014 3:12:33 PM

Post# of 30046
Notice was not sent by the SEC.

If the SEC had notified Radient about delinquent filings and asked for a hearing, the notice would be contained in the below list of SEC notices.

http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin.shtml

Therefore, you can conclude that the letter sent to the SEC by Radient was totally voluntary asking to revoke the stock.

Why did the Aussies ask for revocation? If the Aussies were working with some takeover group who was buying shares, wouldn't that be illegal manipulation that could put the Aussies back in jail?

The above alone would prove there is no takeover group buying shares. All of that garbage was just fabricated by a few shareholders holding worthless shares.

I have never shorted nor intend to have any financial interest in this stock. I am not connected with anyone who trades, shorts or has financial interests in this stock. I only post facts and my opinions. I do not post on IHUB with different aliases.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.