InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 14
Posts 285
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/24/2012

Re: janice shell post# 193262

Thursday, 06/05/2014 3:41:48 PM

Thursday, June 05, 2014 3:41:48 PM

Post# of 232508
The basis of the statement is, true, a gray market stock just submitted a form 10 which contains audited financials. That is one of several requirements of a stock to climb out of both the suspension and the gray market, so my Opinion, is that because 2 year audited financial statements that either reflect continuous revenue growth, and or validate previous stated revenues would point to a viable "real" business in a technology field with at minimum $20 Billion potential in retail, pharmaceuticals, machinery, and other potential industries in need of reducing labor costs, health care costs, theft, inventory tracking etc.. So that is what makes me state that the truth and audited fins would let the company pps stand on its own merits and not NSS or any other factors that have been pointed out. Real verifiable revenue statements will validate company's previous revenue and point a legitimate finger of growth for its Patented technology. Any other questions? IMO of course.