InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 26
Posts 1346
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 03/06/2014

Re: andydub post# 221714

Monday, 06/02/2014 11:16:35 PM

Monday, June 02, 2014 11:16:35 PM

Post# of 799550
What your saying is ostensibly 'collusion' between the parties to take what did not belong to another. Its all fun and game between thieves.

There really doesn't have to be a clear cut reason why someone stole from you or helped someone steal from you. In this case its not important to say, hey, the fhfa got no benefit from helping the government swipe all that money and try to put f and f out of business. Sure, they could and they did, but better yet, if there was no reason to support the takings then perhaps they weren't thinking for themselves and thus were being unduly influenced by treasury. And thus acting in consort with government makes them on their team and thus ... simpatico.

Listen, i get it. Its a confused mess when first they set about to deceive.

There will be lots of legal double speak on this; but what really matters is what happened, not how you justify it. Fact is at the end of the day, all the money was looted. Not how you justify it.