InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 26
Posts 1346
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 03/06/2014

Re: IronMan123 post# 221454

Sunday, 06/01/2014 7:13:32 PM

Sunday, June 01, 2014 7:13:32 PM

Post# of 798120
You know... on the surface this would make sense. But, in reality it does not.

Because until the warrant is shredded, either willingly or by court order; anything that is "left" in the entities, assuming the warrant (which in my opinion is for shet) is exercised; then you would then (as common holders) have 20% of 20% (or 4%) and the Guberment (theives) would hold 96% (80% of the money first pass) and 80% of the 20% residual.

So,

Bad idea.