InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 914
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/14/2011

Re: Arthur Edward Whoof post# 316747

Friday, 05/30/2014 12:42:13 PM

Friday, May 30, 2014 12:42:13 PM

Post# of 375420
Thank you! I appreciate the response. I've seen nothing but random drivel from people bringing up the same tired negative reasoning that doesn't actually apply. This was a solid and legitimate response as to why the negative perspective is valid. And I do agree, as I said in another post they could have easily changed their target since the last time Vigil said anything (although I'd love to see the deal finished next week of course). On the same note, I honestly can't tell if this firm is meant to help with the entire process or just one small piece for the current deal. The wording is vague (as per the norm) so it's difficult to tell what needs to be done here. It really would hinge on their involvement in this particular acquisition.