InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 118
Posts 6733
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/24/2013

Re: steelo28 post# 69415

Thursday, 05/29/2014 7:07:40 PM

Thursday, May 29, 2014 7:07:40 PM

Post# of 163729
That's what I said Steelo. It appears that they are not satisfied with the original agreed upon amount in the courts stipulation. Hence they took 48% more and are still wanting more shares. My point is that the outcome of this can set precedent for them only getting what amounts to the debt + legal fees + agent fee. Thanks… at least that's what I meant