Medinah Minerals (MDMN)

[mrbubba]

That is exactly right. Dr. DeCosta's 4-part series was meant to prime and remind readers on the average porphyry numbers so that they could have some perspective when the assays do come out. Any person of average enlightenment would interpret the series as such, and NOT as any kind of "speculation" as to the numbers we will receive, as someone wrongly asserted, or a 4-part series on ownership amounts. Any valid rebuttal of the series would by definition have to include evidence CONTRARY to that cited by Dr. DeCosta and relating to his general points.

Redirecting the conversation to other issues which are irrelevant to the points he was making is NOT a valid rebuttal.

Let me help (I would draw a picture for you if I could). Dr. DeCosta says that the benchmark average grades for gold/copper/silver/moly content for porphyries is w/x/y/z - can any of the detractors on this board prove that wrong?

Come on, you're smarter than that.