![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Monday, May 26, 2014 4:18:32 PM
You seem level headed enough.
I'd concur with the pricing - with and without the warrant.
My thinking is there is a lot of "stink" in there and at some point the only way for them to "cover it up" is to hope it goes away (which it hasn't) or deal with it. The best way to deal with it is a settlement of some kind. I hope they cancel the warrant and go back to business (pre 2004) or so when they just bought and packaged loans as opposed to other things. Remove the politics and charge a fair price for the services.
Do that.. and i'd concur with your pricing (with or without the warrant) which i expect to be quashed.
Southern Silver Files NI43-101 Technical Report for its Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Cerro Las Minitas Project • SSV • Jul 25, 2024 8:00 AM
Greenlite Ventures Completes Agreement with No Limit Technology • GRNL • Jul 19, 2024 10:00 AM
VAYK Expects Revenue from First Airbnb Property Starting from August • VAYK • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Acquires Mt. Vernon Gold Mine, Sierra County, California, with Assays up to 4.8 oz. Au per Ton • NBRI • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Nightfood Holdings Signs Letter of Intent for All-Stock Acquisition of CarryOutSupplies.com • NGTF • Jul 17, 2024 1:00 PM
Kona Gold Beverages Reaches Out to Largest Debt Holder for Debt Purchase Negotiation • KGKG • Jul 17, 2024 9:00 AM