Great post, RZ. Several of us on this board has addressed the lack of professionalism and completeness at HRT in the administrative, financial and legal ranks, including those third parties, hired to provide "review of disclosures and documents." This obvious error is another example of the amateurish and uncaring approach HRT's management, current and past, has towards shareholders.
Having been an employee of, as well as watching, companies who are top management focused, I have no trouble believing your expectations, RZ and North, of what might happen to the minority shareholders in any actions taken by this management team.
We need to vote "NO" to put HRT/Tanure and his group on notice that they are being watched and challenged when their actions are deemed unfair and exclusion-oriented of those minority shareholders who have been in the stock for years.
We might only be little mosquitos on their proverbial elephant's butt, but they might feel the stings if there are enough of us mosquitos such that it makes HRT to think twice if it knows we aren't going away quietly.
The more votes that say "NO," the better chance we have of being heard and less chance of being scr**ed over by HRT/Tanure.
For those who believe the vote is a foregone conclusion (which it probably is), regardless of what the minority shareholders do, then you should vote "No" so that HRT/Tanure knows you want to be treated fairly, too; agreeing with them does not provide you with any comfort or assurances that you will be treated fairly under the new by-laws et al.
AI
