Do you know what I think it could be? I think the 14-16,000 repetitions of "Dilution" and "scam" were the "scare" words used by External Influences to influence perception. It's about the repetitions. That's what I think. But perhaps not.
Let's pretend for a moment that I posted 137 examples of something like the following. Note the copious use of "scare" words. Note too, the extensive documentation offered to support my "theories:"
".0001 then r/s to .001 ...Sgcp....0001/ .0002 next week... Waiting for the reverse split to short more...It's at a stand still, r/s is needed to sell more shares...Sell out before the r/s.....When is the r/s? ...They need to do a r/s soon Or the bill will not be paid ....jmo....0001 in the near future, for sure...Dilution starting up ,.0001 then no bid.... Time to r/s....0001 tomorrow ... That bid will dry up....0001 tomorrow, that is where it will stay.....Another scam...Bag holders are stuck in this scam... Buyer beware.......ScamThis stock is dead in the water.... This scam is toast "
There appears to be a theme.
If my "insights" were combined with the 14-16,000 similar content "insights" of External Influences They ultimately might culminate in the priceless dupedbysteve pièce de résistance articulated below:
"I have one hope for SGCP shareholders, sgcp management die in a fiery plane crash."
If I had made 14-16000 posts of similar style and "content" one might think I was trying to educate the board. Share my research and the like.
But I don't think so.
It is more likely one might conclude I was trying the poison the post stream, to discourage additional investment, to screw over the shareholders, to screw over the people of Sierra Leone, and in short, to be a real A.H. That's what they might conclude about me I I did something like that.
No. The company didn't screw us over, but I know who did.
