Reading the docket, and the EC objection, stating that they believe that the comp. got bids for Edisc. at prox. 170 mio. in sept. 2013, and their objection to the Lenders claim. I start to believe, that either the Dolan board of D, acted in ill fait, when they issued the preferred stock in early 2013, or they did not act prudent if an offer for Edisc. actually was given in the exess of 170 mio. in sept.2013.
and if the Lender at that time halted a sale of Edisc. in ill faith, because they had a plan of taking over the comp.
So in any way, either the comp acted in ill fait and thus should face a criminal charge, or the Lender from the beginning acted in ill faith ( loan to own ) and their claim should be dismissed.
