So if they didn't file on time, the question is why?
They said on the NT 10Q that there wouldn't be any significant changes in results of operations (Part IV Para 03) so if there's little change, why the late filing?
In my mind there's nothing happened which has affected the Q1/2014 results but there might be something to declare which will have an impact on future performance and that makes me wonder if there's an announcement due regarding patents/joint ventures/ partnerships or something else (who knows maybe an out of court settlement with Ironridge???). The point is it looks like something is happening that the BOD can't discuss at the moment which I totally get...
However, many of you are right, as a 'serious' company, records need to be filed according to the rules but these guys aren't stupid, they didn't file for a reason (just the same as the annual report was held back for the court ruling) and I think that reason will become apparent in the very near future and we may see some good stuff coming our way.
I'm a stiff-assed Brit so I don't do theatrics but to quote a number of you: "SVFC to da moon..."
