InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 60
Posts 5252
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 11/10/2009

Re: JayRyan post# 193558

Tuesday, 05/20/2014 3:14:30 PM

Tuesday, May 20, 2014 3:14:30 PM

Post# of 380514
erratic PPS action reflects-a-market/investor-imagined, future, "smoking-gun"-scenario**……….

instinctive prediction that in "hindsight" is referred to as a "smoking gun",,,,,,,that KILLS the company just as it takes its well PROMOTED, promised TRIP to dollarland

**usually rendered by some unethical or uncontrollable, ill positioned officer or exec, compounded by emotional ties like family or ego-struggles…….see ANY here??????

ONE cocktail enhanced MISTAKE, at a shareholder party or furious media blog session is all it takes

HOW MANY big names are circulating here……what do they contribute??????

,……. because they HAVEN'T enhanced shareholder value >>>

>>>> the PPS has NO CORRELATION to the TOUTED resumes on NTEK's roster……

….I never saw Lee Iacocca hanging out with Tesla or SmartCar…they didn't need him, or want him around……..WHY DOES NTEK want all these names without their brainpower at work????

put up an IMAGE, perhaps??????

of course, as this "smoking gun" prediction is THEORY on my part(sort of like NP-1's available to any shdlr at SHM theory)………., what else could explain the HUGE hesitancy in the PPS for such a BRIGHTLY positioned intellectual company like NTEK………this was up NEAR 300% from todays PPS (and that # still "way undervalues" NTEKs documented projections)

still don't know if NTEK deserves the RISK of OPM……my money…..the FLIP money has been MADE

its been 6 months of EXPERTS (here) SPECULATING on the NP-1's origin, unveiling, and relevance…..why not a little more to explain the PPS dilemma……….

this SPECUALTION of course, BECOMES even stronger now that the VOICES are downplaying the revenue dependence %'s that WERE projected to the NP-1 (since it aint here….NO REVENUES IN 1st half, or maybe 2nd half 2014)