Friday, March 17, 2006 5:31:25 PM
They have always been countered with arguments regarding the potential viability of the technology and the intellectual property of the company.
No one has yet mentioned the scenario in which the financier purposely drives the pps into the ground, not to escape covering a short position, but in order to gain exclusive control of that technology.
Such a farfetched concept would not even occur to me if I hadn't seen this text in the latest filing;
The Note is due and payable in full on March 6, 2007. Other than the discount inherent in its purchase price, the Note is noninterest-bearing. The Note will be repaid using 100% of the proceeds of each put notice delivered by the Registrant to Dutchess under the Investment Agreement. The Note is also
secured by a security interest in substantially all of the Registrant's assets pursuant to a Security Agreement dated October 21, 2005 with Dutchess.
So what happens if the pps declines to the point that the Note cannot be repaid by dumping shares?
Does Dutchess get everything? Looks like it.
regards,
frog
North Bay Resources Announces Assays up to 5 oz/ton Gold, 1.5 oz/ton Platinum, 0.5 oz/ton Palladium, and 0.5 oz/ton Rhodium at Mt. Vernon Gold Mine, Sierra County, California • NBRI • Oct 4, 2024 9:15 AM
Basanite, Inc. Appoints Ali Manav as Interim Chief Executive Officer • BASA • Oct 3, 2024 9:15 AM
Integrated Ventures Announces Launch of MedWell Facilities, LLC and Lease Agreement with Giant Fitness Clubs • INTV • Oct 3, 2024 8:45 AM
Beyond the Horizon: Innovative Drug Combinations Offer New Hope for Alzheimer's and More • NVS • Oct 3, 2024 8:45 AM
SMX and FinGo Enter Into Collaboration Mandate to Develop a Joint 'Physical to Digital' Platform Service To Enhance Natural Rubber Industry's Ability to Report on Sustainable and Ethical Supply Chains • SMX • Oct 3, 2024 7:00 AM
Transforming Alzheimer's Treatment: Innovative Combinations to Boost Cognition • PFE • Oct 2, 2024 9:00 AM