InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 9
Posts 273
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/09/2014

Re: Art Vandeley post# 168332

Monday, 05/19/2014 7:02:38 PM

Monday, May 19, 2014 7:02:38 PM

Post# of 238365
I'm not sure you're correct there Doc

(Posted for those who have not already read it):
http://www.votehemp.com/PDF/HIAvDEA_9th_final_decision.pdf

The court found that non psychoactive hemp, hemp you can not get high off of did not fit into the DEA's Schedule 1 therefore the DEA could not prohibit then. This is not the same situation.

Cannabidiol is, quite stupidly in my opinion a Schedule 1 substance. Seventh from the top on the list on this page:

http://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/drugreg/reg_apps/225/225_instruct.htm

The previous court case found that unusable but not unmeasurable THC levels in hemp based products could not be used by the DEA to keep those products off the market. Important difference, MJNA/HempMedsPx/Kannaway are not claiming the CBD content of their products falls below the threshold of having any sort of effect, in fact they claim the opposite. They tout themselves as having the most effective CBD products on the market.

Again, let me state how stupid I think it is that CBD is currently listed as a Schedule 1 substance but it is. Anyone running for or currently in congress who introduces a bill to change the existing law may well find my support. Yet the fact remains, if some bureaucrat with the proper title gets a bug up their but they could send a shut down notice to CANV/MJNA/Kannaway and their respective attorneys would be earning their pay by telling them to shut it down till the court rules in their favor. Which I'd hope they would, quickly.