InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 913
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/25/2013

Re: mike_usa post# 217768

Sunday, 05/18/2014 10:12:54 AM

Sunday, May 18, 2014 10:12:54 AM

Post# of 796970
Is it possible that Obama addad the third amendment to insure that FnF would pay tax payers back before the possible take over of the white house by the republicans in 2016 because he knows they will get rid of them and he wants to keep FnF in order to allow the middle class homeownership, or are both parties working only for the banks and they want to get rid of FnF so that the banks can take over the profits?

Sorry to ramble, it's early and I just woke up here on the west coast

PS-Thanks Mike_USA, that's much appreciated and it's good to be back. Originally this post was going to be solely to relay my thanks to you but I'm allowed only two post a day so I had to squeeze it all in.