InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,543.22
(
1.61%
)
US TECH 100
19,002.00
(
2.66%
)
Dow Jones
40,563.06
(
1.39%
)
Brent Oil
80.34
(
-0.18%
)
Bitcoin
58,232.71
(
1.20%
)
Post# of 489450
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

fuagf

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 72
Posts 102237
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 08/01/2006

fuagf

Member Level

Re: rooster post# 222654

Sunday, 05/18/2014 12:18:28 AM

Sunday, May 18, 2014 12:18:28 AM

Post# of 489450
rooster, a note from F6's reply to you

A large number of the scientific papers submitted to peer-reviewed journals are rejected, usually because of
criticisms of the scientific methods used or because the research does not represent a major new advance in
thinking. Environmental Research Letters told the Guardian that it rejects about 65-70% of the papers submitted to it.

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/may/16/rejected-climate-science-paper-environmental-research-letters

F6's .. http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=102133541

.. i think that rejection fact could be important for you to remember in the future ..

It was Plato who said, “He, O men, is the wisest, who like Socrates, knows that his wisdom is in truth worth nothing”

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up