InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 6061
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/10/2000

Re: DAVE_007 post# 48954

Friday, 03/17/2006 8:59:04 AM

Friday, March 17, 2006 8:59:04 AM

Post# of 315345
re: "...you have to consider the sources..."

many things are "interesting"

1. i believe the RB poster was trying to be positive, not negative, so why some longs would be so adverse to the posts content is curious??

2. when past posts [such as the now infamous convers post] of the supposed exchange with SW was being digested/reviewed/critiqued, many were hootin' and hollerin', and immediately stepped up to support/defend it...until it was of course "dispelled"

3. the same content of the post now in question has been debated here for the past couple of weeks...what?, now none of those points exist?

4. i would be [and have been] one of the first to dismiss these types of posts as nothing more than fantastical hear-say, but since so many here continue to embrace these types of so-called communications as worthy [of course only when they contain data that is self-serving], i dont see how discussing/reviewing this one now is out of context

5. the truth is EVERYONE is flying blind here when it comes to internal goings-on, as not one 8K has been filed with details of ANY of the events that have transpired over the past several months [including share info]

6. SSDD, and all anyone can do is hope/pray [if so inclined] that some MOMO will be generated...from what source is anyone guess

GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO BKMP! ;)