Friday, May 16, 2014 1:10:57 AM
Good input. That means for Units #1, #2, and #2 the Incurred Cost is in the ball park with the SAIC Summary number of 9 Million for a 3-unit cluster.
JBI would not have incurred as much cost as the SAIC estimate, because the SAIC estimate would have been fully loaded with Union labor rates and norms, and all of the true costs to build the plant. JBI took a lot of shortcuts, used their own labor and machine shop, etc.
So you are supporting what I am saying.
The cost to the Owner will be similar to the SAIC study number of 9 Million max. JBI provides key equipment (processors..) and associated engineering , Project management, and Commissioning Support. They are not a Construction company, nor are they an Engineering house. So they would receive maybe 4-5 Million of the 9 Million on a 3-unit cluster (to use that configuration as an example).
Of that, I am guessing their Profit Margins would be 1 - 1.5 Million, based on a 20 or 30% markup.
Thanks Rawnoc!!!
Green Leaf Innovations, Inc. Engages Olayinka Oyebola & Co for Two-Year Audit • GRLF • May 28, 2024 8:30 AM
HealthLynked Introduces AI-Powered Chat Function to Enhance Healthcare Accessibility • HLYK • May 28, 2024 8:00 AM
Avant Technologies Engages Wired4Tech to Evaluate the Performance of Next Generation AI Server Technology • AVAI • May 23, 2024 8:00 AM
Branded Legacy, Inc. Unveils Collaboration with Celebrity Tattoo Artist Kat Tat for New Tattoo Aftercare Product • BLEG • May 22, 2024 8:30 AM
"Defo's Morning Briefing" Set to Debut for "GreenliteTV" • GRNL • May 21, 2024 2:28 PM
North Bay Resources Announces 50/50 JV at Fran Gold Project, British Columbia; Initiates NI 43-101 Resources Estimate and Bulk Sample • NBRI • May 21, 2024 9:07 AM